Why U.S. Sanctions Can’t Stop Iran’s Oil: China’s Hidden Energy Lifeline
The story of how Iran has kept sending barrels of crude oil into global markets despite sweeping U.S. sanctions is fundamentally also a story of how China has quietly become the linchpin of that survival strategy. Washington’s aim — choking off Iran’s oil revenues in order to curb its nuclear programme, ballistic-missile development and regional proxy networks — continues to be undermined by Beijing’s willingness and ability to absorb and hide the flows. This blog explores how China supports Iran’s oil exports, how the sanctions are being circumvented, and why the U.S. campaign is far from achieving its stated goal.
1. The U.S. sanctions regime: ambition vs reality
From the U.S. view, Iran’s oil exports are the lifeline of its regime ambitions. The logic: restrict oil, cut off revenue, weaken Iran’s capacity to fund its nuclear programme and regional proxies. The U.S. has deployed tools such as:
Primary sanctions (prohibiting U.S. persons from dealing with designated Iranian oil-entities).
Secondary sanctions (threatening non-U.S. persons who engage with Iran’s oil sector).
Targeting tankers, ship-owners, ports, and financial channels that facilitate Iranian oil trade.
Proclaiming a “maximum pressure” campaign aimed at reducing Iranian exports to near zero.
In theory, if executed fully, the result would be a near-halt in Iran’s ability to sell crude. But in practice:
Iran’s crude exports have never dropped to zero; according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Iran’s crude and condensate exports recovered from a low of about 0.4 million b/d in 2020 to nearly 1.4 million b/d by 2023.
Sanctions may make the business more complex and risky, but they haven’t eliminated the flow.
Why? Because sanctions operate in a system where cooperation matters: if major buyers or facilitators refuse to comply, the isolating effect is blunted. And that cooperation, in large part, is what China refuses to give.
2. China’s role: the buyer no one can ignore
China is not just a buyer; it is the buyer when it comes to Iranian crude. Some of the key facts:
According to tracking firms and EIA, China takes nearly 90 % of Iran’s crude and condensate exports.
Chinese imports of Iranian oil surged in recent years: in June 2025, Chinese imports of Iranian crude reached a record high — about 1.8 million barrels per day (bpd) according to one tracking firm.
Many of the purchases are made by independent Chinese refiners (so-called “teapots”) rather than the big state-oil companies.
China has officially stated it rejects unilateral sanctions and considers its trade with Iran legitimate.
In short: China holds the muscle to sustain Iranian oil exports. Without it, the isolating policy would stand a much better chance.
3. How the trade is hidden — the mechanics of evasion
So how exactly does the Iran-China oil trade work under sanctions? The outline of the hidden system involves several layers:
a) Ship-to-ship transfers and “shadow fleets”
Iran uses older tankers, sometimes switching off tracking systems, or transferring cargo between vessels at sea (often in waters near Malaysia or Singapore) to obscure origin.
The U.S. has designated vessels involved in these networks and has even targeted Chinese terminals linked to Iranian crude.
b) Trans-shipment and rebranding
Once the oil has shifted vessels or mixed in storage, it arrives in China under different labels, for example declared as Malaysian origin. Chinese customs data often does not show Iranian-origin oil.
c) Payment bypassing the dollar-system
To avoid U.S.-dollar‐clearing and U.S. jurisdiction, Iran and China often settle via yuan, barter, or infrastructure-for-oil deals.
One recent deal: China and Iran sealed a barter framework where crude is exchanged for Chinese-built infrastructure in Iran, reducing direct cash flows that could be interdicted.
d) Discounts and incentives
Iran’s oil sells at a marked discount to non-sanctioned barrels; Chinese buyers reap the margin. One source reported that Iran sells 92% of its oil exports to China at a minimum 30% discount.
For independent Chinese refineries squeezed by competition and domestic demand, this discount makes Iranian oil attractive.
4. Why U.S. sanctions are constrained in effectiveness
Several factors limit how far U.S. sanctions can cut off Iran’s oil revenue:
A) Lack of Chinese cooperation.
Without Beijing’s buy-in, the isolation strategy falters. China has publicly stated it will defend its sovereign right to choose trade partners.
B) Structural dependence and incentives.
Iran needs buyers; China needs cheap supply. That mutual benefit creates strong alignment. Chinese “teapot” refiners, though small, already absorb large volumes of Iranian crude. China also enjoys energy security and strategic Middle East presence by backing Iran.
C) Enabling infrastructure and financial workaround.
Once vessels, storage tanks, and payment routes are adapted, the trade becomes resilient. Sanctions push up cost and risk — but they don’t automatically stop trade. For example, increased freight costs were noted: “freight costs … have more than doubled since late 2024” for some Iran→China voyages.
D) Sanctions enforcement trade-offs.
The U.S. can sanction certain entities, but broad enforcement across multiple jurisdictions is complex. If major Chinese firms and banks are not targeted, the system adapts. Indeed, major Chinese state oil companies have reportedly stayed clear of the riskiest parts of the trade, letting smaller refiners absorb the risk.
E) Market and timing dynamics.
Iran can load up oil before sanctions hit or use floating storage. China can stockpile ahead of demand peaks (for example, summer refining season) or geopolitical disruption. We saw Chinese imports spike ahead of sanctions or in response to sanction threats.
5. Implications and strategic consequences
The persistence of Iran-China oil flows under sanctions has wide-ranging implications:
For Iran:
It secures a lifeline of revenue even under maximum pressure campaigns.
The ability to sell crude means some level of funding for government programmes, albeit at discounted prices.
The strategic partnership with China gives Tehran more resilience against U.S. isolation.
For China:
It gains access to significant volumes of crude at discounted rates.
It strengthens its strategic presence and influence in the Middle East.
It signals Beijing’s willingness to defy U.S. unilateral sanctions and assert an independent trade policy.
For the U.S. and the global order:
The episode illustrates the limits of unilateral sanctions when other major powers resist compliance.
It raises questions about sanction design, enforcement coverage, and the need for multilateral cooperation.
It shows how energy geopolitics continue to adapt: state actors will find workarounds, shadow fleets, barter deals, and opaque logistics.
Moreover, China’s role complicates Washington’s calculus: targeting China-based actors risks broader Sino-U.S. economic tensions.
For the oil market:
Iran’s ability to deliver crude into China helps maintain global supply, which can dampen price spikes that sanctions-hopers might expect.
The discounting of Iranian crude places pressure on other producers’ pricing, and complicates market dynamics.
As China stocks up or guarantees supply from Iran, it may also reshape regional refining, storage and shipping networks in Asia that favour those parity arrangements.
6. The bottom line: why sanctions alone cannot suffice
In effect, U.S. policy aimed at cutting Iran’s oil-driven revenue is running head-first into a deeper structural reality: Iran will sell crude if someone wants to buy it, and China does. Because Beijing is willing to accept the risk (of secondary sanctions) and has developed the logistics (shadow fleet, re-labelling, yuan settlement, trans‐shipment), the trade is not being choked off.
U.S. sanctions can raise costs, increase risks, reduce volumes slightly — but they cannot fully sever the trade so long as a trading partner like China remains committed and capable. A few key takeaways:
The effectiveness of sanctions is directly tied to broad, multilateral participation and enforcement. When major centres like China don’t engage, the impact is weakened.
Energy relationships are long-term, strategic and involve infrastructure, finance, and logistics — not just simple supplier-buyer transactions.
States like China and Iran exploit vulnerabilities in the global financial and shipping infrastructure (e.g., dollar system, vessel tracking, port transparency) to evade sanctions.
If the U.S. wants to increase leverage, it must consider how to incentivize or coerce major buyers (China, India, etc.) to align, or alternatively accept that sanctions will only partially constrain the target state.
7. What to watch going forward
Further U.S. sanctions on Chinese refiners/terminals: If Washington targets a major Chinese state firm or shipping entity rather than smaller independents, the slap might be bigger. Recent actions show this possibility.
Quality and origin of tracked oil flows: As data gathering firms like Kpler and Vortexa continue refining methods, we will get clearer views of actual “dark fleet” routing.
China’s domestic refining strategy: If China begins to embrace more sanctioned sources at the expense of Western suppliers, the energy map shifts.
The Iran-China infrastructure trade: The barter deals may expand, embedding long-term obligations and making the relationship more durable beyond spot crude sales.
Global energy market shocks: If a sudden disruption occurs (e.g., in the Strait of Hormuz or further escalation involving Iran), the resilience of Tehran’s export route via China will be tested under stress conditions.
Final Thoughts
The U.S. sanctions on Iran’s oil exports represent a bold policy effort, but one that is inherently limited by the shape of modern global trade — especially energy trade. China’s role as a large, willing buyer and an adaptable partner gives Iran a route to circumvent the pressure. China doesn’t just buy the oil; it supports the infrastructure, logistics and payments architecture that make the trade viable under sanctions.
In other words: as long as China remains the energy lifeline, U.S. efforts to choke off Iran’s crude export revenue will be constrained. For the U.S. strategy to succeed fully, it must either bring Beijing into alignment or alter the structural incentives so that the cost of buying Iranian oil becomes prohibitive for China. Until then, Iran’s barrels will continue to flow — not loudly, not transparently — but steadily.
.png)
